4.7 Article

Viral protein engagement of GBF1 induces host cell vulnerability through synthetic lethality

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
卷 221, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.202011050

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM112108, P41 GM109824, R21 AI151344]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [FDN-167277]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using a viral-induced hypomorph of GBF1, this study demonstrates that the principle of synthetic lethality can selectively kill virus-infected cells. Viral protein interactions can induce hypomorphs in host cells, making them selectively vulnerable to perturbations.
Using a viral-induced hypomorph of GBF1, Navare et al. demonstrate that the principle of synthetic lethality is a mechanism to selectively kill virus-infected cells. Viruses co-opt host proteins to carry out their lifecycle. Repurposed host proteins may thus become functionally compromised; a situation analogous to a loss-of-function mutation. We term such host proteins as viral-induced hypomorphs. Cells bearing cancer driver loss-of-function mutations have successfully been targeted with drugs perturbing proteins encoded by the synthetic lethal (SL) partners of cancer-specific mutations. Similarly, SL interactions of viral-induced hypomorphs can potentially be targeted as host-based antiviral therapeutics. Here, we use GBF1, which supports the infection of many RNA viruses, as a proof-of-concept. GBF1 becomes a hypomorph upon interaction with the poliovirus protein 3A. Screening for SL partners of GBF1 revealed ARF1 as the top hit, disruption of which selectively killed cells that synthesize 3A alone or in the context of a poliovirus replicon. Thus, viral protein interactions can induce hypomorphs that render host cells selectively vulnerable to perturbations that leave uninfected cells otherwise unscathed. Exploiting viral-induced vulnerabilities could lead to broad-spectrum antivirals for many viruses, including SARS-CoV-2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据