4.8 Article

Organic-free modulation of the framework Al distribution in ZSM-5 zeolite by magnesium participated synthesis and its impact on the catalytic cracking reaction of alkanes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 413, 期 -, 页码 735-750

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2022.07.032

关键词

Al distribution; ZSM-5 zeolite; Hydride transfer; Propylene; Catalytic cracking

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22021004]
  2. Petro China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The distribution of aluminum and magnesium in [Al, Mg]-ZSM-5 zeolites significantly affects their catalytic performance, and the hydrothermal synthesis method can effectively regulate the location of framework aluminum. The introduction of magnesium by this method inhibits the hydride transfer process, thereby increasing the yields of propylene in catalytic cracking reactions.
Al distribution engineering is an effective way to tune the catalytic performance of ZSM-5 zeolite. In the present work, a series of [Al, Mg]-ZSM-5 with different Mg contents were obtained by hydrothermal synthesis method. For comparison, Mg/ZSM-5 with a comparable Mg content were also prepared using the conventional impregnation method. Characterizations of XPS-sputtering, H-2-TPR and Py-IR indicated the distribution and coordination structures of Mg in the samples obtained by the two preparation methods were quite different. Besides, the introduction of magnesium by hydrothermal synthesis well regulates the location of framework Al, which is not possible by the impregnation method. Al-27 MAS NMR and UV-vis-DRS of Co2+-exchanged zeolites demonstrated [Al,1.0 Mg]-ZSM-5 has less aluminum in the channel intersections compared to conventional HZSM-5. Finally, the significantly lower content of Al pairs in [Al,1.0 Mg]-ZSM-5 inhibits the hydride transfer process, resulting in higher yields of propylene in noctane and crude oil catalytic cracking reactions. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据