Concurrent validity of artificial intelligence-based markerless motion capture for over-ground gait analysis: A study of spatiotemporal parameters

Gait analysis is used in research and clinical environments; yet several limitations exist in current methodologies. Markerless systems, utilizing high-speed video and artificial intelligence, eliminate most limitations encountered in marker-, depth-, or inertial sensor-based systems; however, further development is needed to improve their utility and accessibility in practice. Spatiotemporal parameters from 22 young adults were estimated during over-ground gait. Nine parameters were calculated using events determined from force plate information com-bined with foot segment tracking and from motion of the foot relative to the sacrum using marker-based and markerless tracking. Two-way mixed effects, single measurement, absolute agreement and relative consistency interclass correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman bias and limits of agreement, and Lin's concordance correlations were used to examine the validity of parameters from markerless tracking compared to parameters calculated from gait event methods using force plates and marker-based tracking. Gait speed, stride length, step length, cycle time, and step time from the markerless system all showed strong agreement with the force plate method. Other markerless-determined parameters were not as accurate. Differences in stride width are attributable to inconsistencies in foot segment definitions between models; while differences in stance time, swing time, and double limb support time were influenced by gait event methods. Mean differences in gait parameters were smaller than meaningful clinical differences in Parkinson's disease patients and within ranges of reference values for elderly subjects. Further studies are needed to determine the validity across other patient groups, but results support the continued development of markerless systems for over-ground gait analysis.

Automated summary

The study evaluated the validity of using markerless systems for gait analysis, with some parameters showing strong agreement with traditional methods and others lacking accuracy.