4.6 Article

Rosin natural terpenes as processing aid for polyhydroxyalkanoate: Thermal, mechanical, and viscoelastic properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 139, 期 43, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.53052

关键词

biopolymers and renewable polymers; differential scanning calorimetry; mechanical properties; packaging; rheology

资金

  1. ANR PRCI SEABIOP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the effect of adding rosin natural terpene to bacterial thermoplastic polyesters. The results show that the addition of rosin has limited impact on the mechanical properties of the blends. Additionally, rheological and thermal analysis techniques were used to study the physical properties of the blends.
Rosin natural terpene (Dertoline) is compounded with a bacterial thermoplastic polyesters polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA), specifically here poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), a biodegradable and biocompatible polymer. The compatibility of the blend is examined with differential scanning calorimetry and thermal gravimetry analysis. In the range of concentration of Dertoline, from 5 to 15 wt%, a cold crystallization peak first shifts to slightly higher then lower temperature. Dynamical mechanical analysis and tensile tests confirm that the addition of Dertoline slightly decreases the elastic modulus. The degree of crystallinity again increases then decreases with the content of Dertoline. Polarized light microscopy reveals smaller diameter spherulites for PHB/Dertoline blends and their presence is discussed in relation to tensile tests. Overall, the addition of Dertoline has limited effects on mechanical properties of the blends: the stress at break and the strain at break. In addition, oscillatory rheology at different temperatures provides the activation energies and the parameters of a generalized Maxwell model. The temperature dependence of the rheological properties follows an Arrhenius form. Finally, transient step viscosity measurements are used in order to quantify the PHB thermal degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据