4.6 Article

Room temperature fabrication of poly-crystalline Si thin films via Al-induced crystallization under 500 keV Xe+ ion irradiation

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 132, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0099262

关键词

-

资金

  1. IUAC, New Delhi [UFR-58308]
  2. DAE of India
  3. UGC
  4. DST, Government of India, New Delhi
  5. Shiv Nadar University for the Postdoctoral Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a novel technique for developing poly-crystalline Si thin films at room temperature using ion irradiation. The crystallization temperature is reduced through the process of aluminum-induced crystallization. The study shows that increasing ion fluence leads to higher crystallinity of Si.
Poly-crystalline Si film is an important material for its applications in microelectronics and solar cells. In order to realize poly-crystalline Si for practical application with high performance, it needs to be fabricated at room temperature. In this paper, we present a novel technique to develop poly-crystalline Si thin films at room temperature using 500 keV Xe+ ion irradiation. Here, the Al-induced crystallization process is employed to reduce the crystallization temperature. For that, c-Al (50 nm)/a-Si (150 nm) bilayer thin films have been used for ion irradiation experiments. Structural studies show that crystallization of Si starts at a threshold fluence of 3 x 10(15) ions cm(-2), and crystallinity is found to increase with increasing ion fluence. The results are explained in terms of displacement spike and thermal spike due to the interaction of energetic ions with target atoms. The transport of ions in matter Monte Carlo computer simulation code has been used to estimate the number of displacements due to ion irradiation. Generation of a sufficient amount of free Si atoms at threshold fluence and diffusion of these free Si atoms along the Al grain boundary starts the nucleation process. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据