4.6 Article

Effect of atomic types and concentration on the mechanical properties of CoNi-based concentrated solid-solution alloys

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 132, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0102785

关键词

-

资金

  1. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2108085MA25]
  2. Singapore MTC Programmatic Funding [AMDM A1898b0043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concentrated solid-solution alloys (CSAs) are a new type of alloy material with high strength, extreme hardness, remarkable corrosion resistance, and excellent radiation resistance. The mechanical properties of CSAs are strongly determined by the types and concentration of component elements, which provide a large space for design.
Concentrated solid-solution alloys (CSAs) are a new type of alloy material with high strength, extreme hardness, remarkable corrosion resistance, and excellent radiation resistance. The mechanical properties of CSAs are strongly determined by the types and concentration of component elements, which provide a large space for design. In this work, molecular dynamics simulations were implemented to investigate the mechanical properties of CoNi-based CSAs. Our study showed that there is a significant effect of constituent types on the yield stress and Young's modulus of CoNi-based CSAs. The yield stress and Young's modulus of CoNiFeAlCu CSAs with equal atomic ratios were found to be 3.02 and 70.94 GPa, respectively. With the increase in the Fe concentration, the yield stress and Young's modulus of the CSAs decrease gradually; on the contrary, these properties increase gradually with an increase in the Al concentration. The CoNiFeCuAl6 CSA was found to exhibit high strength and good plastic deformation ability, which originates from the significant increase in the dislocation density. Hence, the large design space of CSAs presents a great opportunity to select CSAs with excellent mechanical properties for structural applications. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据