4.6 Article

Indentation response of model oxide dispersion strengthening alloys after ion irradiation up to 700 °C

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 132, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0092138

关键词

-

资金

  1. VEGA
  2. [VEGA 1/0477/16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an experimental investigation of irradiation-induced evolutions in three different oxide dispersion strengthening alloys. It documents and interprets the dose-dependent changes in particle size and number density, as well as evaluates the corresponding micro-mechanical changes in the alloys.
This paper presents an experimental investigation of irradiation-induced evolutions in three different oxide dispersion strengthening (ODS) alloys. High-dose, dual beam Ni-He ion irradiations are carried out up to 700 degrees C. The significant dose-dependent changes in the ODS particle size and number density are documented and interpreted in terms of specific point defect transport mechanisms, from small angle neutron scattering, TEM, and pulsed low-energy positron system measurements combined. The corresponding micro-mechanical changes in the alloys are evaluated based on the indentation response, which is, in turn, interpreted in terms of related, sub-grain plasticity mechanisms. The room temperature tests (without dwell time) reveal that the microscale work-hardening rate increases with decreasing the particle number density and pronounced strain localization effect. The elevated temperature tests (up to 600 degrees C, with dwell time) show that the indentation creep compliance is mostly temperature-independent after irradiation up to 25 dpa at T-irr = 500 degrees C and markedly temperature-dependent, after irradiation beyond 40 dpa at T-irr = 600 degrees C. This effect is ascribed to particular creep mechanisms associated with indent-induced plasticity, i.e., high stress and high dislocation density conditions. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据