4.7 Article

Study of waste rubber catalytic pyrolysis in a rotary kiln reactor with spent fluid-catalytic-cracking catalysts

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105686

关键词

Waste rubber; Spent FCC catalysts; Catalytic pyrolysis; Pyrolysis mechanism; Product valorization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52103117, 52173101]
  2. Qingdao Science and Technology Benefit People Demonstration Guide Special Project [22-3-7-cspz-18-nsh]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to reduce the cost of catalytic pyrolysis of waste rubber by using spent FCC catalysts and to improve the quality and production efficiency of pyrolysis products through collaborative high-value reuse of waste rubber and spent FCC catalysts.
The low utilization rate of waste rubber has caused serious environmental pollution problems. Catalytic pyrolysis is an effective method for ensuring the resource utilization of waste rubber. However, the high cost and nonrecyclability of the used catalysts complicate the utilization of this method in industrial applications. In this paper, the spent fluid-catalytic-cracking (FCC) catalysts were applied into pyrolysis of waste rubber, aiming to reduce the cost of catalytic pyrolysis of waste rubber. At the same time, the pyrolysis mechanisms of the spent FCC catalysts used in waste rubber were studied. Pyrolysis/catalytic pyrolysis experiments on single-rubber-type unvulcanized rubber, single-rubber-type vulcanized rubber, and tread compounds were performed in a selfdeveloped industrial pilot plant. The experimental results showed that the pyrolysis oil yield of the spent FCC catalysts catalyzed pyrolysis of the waste rubber increased and the content of light aromatics in increased by more than 90 %, indicating that the spent FCC catalysts applied in waste rubber can improve the quality of pyrolysis products, increase production efficiency, and realize the collaborative high-value reuse of waste rubberand spent FCC catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据