4.7 Article

Preparation and electrochemical properties of Co doped core-shell cathode material on a lithium iron phosphate surface

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 923, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166326

关键词

LiFePO4; Co surface doping; Core-shell structure; Electron conductivity; Interface stability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52064035]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Gansu Province [21YF5GA078]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LGG22E020003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A core-shell structured lithium iron phosphate (LFP) material with LFP as the core and LiCoxFe1-xO4 as the shell was prepared using the solvothermal method. Doping of cobalt widened the diffusion channel of Li+ and improved the electronic conductivity of LFP. In addition, cobalt on the surface inhibited electrolyte corrosion and protected the material's structure. The core-shell structure material exhibited good interface and cycle stability, as well as excellent cycle and rate performance.
A core-shell structured lithium iron phosphate (LFP) with LFP as the core and LiCox Fe1-xO4 as the shell was prepared using the solvothermal method. The doped Co broadened the diffusion channel of Li+ in the [010] direction. Combined with the interface migration model, this core-shell structure was found to enhance the diffusion of Li+. The doped Co facilitated the formation of CoP, thereby improving the electronic conductivity of LFP. In addition, Co on the surface inhibited the corrosion of electrolytes during the cycle and protected the olivine structure of LFP. This core-shell structure cathode material possesses good interface stability and cycle stability during the cycle process. Electrochemical tests found the Co-doped core-shell structure to improve conductivity and exhibit excellent cycle performance and rate performance and it maintained 165.1mAh g(-1) 300 cycles at 0.1 C. (C) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据