4.7 Article

Structure and corrosion behavior of Cu-26Zn-5Al alloy processed by accumulative roll bonding and heat treatment

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 924, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166574

关键词

Shape memory alloy (SMA); Accumulative roll bonding (ARB); Corrosion behavior; Heat treatment; Martensite

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cu-26Zn-5Al shape memory alloy was produced by accumulative roll bonding and heat treatment. The effects of different austenitization cycles and cooling conditions on the microstructure and corrosion behavior were investigated. The results showed that fully martensitic microstructure and optimal corrosion resistance were achieved by cooling in boiling water.
Cu-26Zn-5Al shape memory alloy (SMA) was produced by accumulative roll bonding (ARB) and subsequent heat treatment. In this regard, different austenitization cycles and cooling conditions, including furnace, air, cold-water, and boiling-water cooling were experimented. The heat-treated specimens were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The corrosion behavior of the specimens was also studied by potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in a 3.5 wt% NaCl solution. The results revealed that only by cooling in the boiling- and ice-water environments, a fully martensitic microstructure showing the shape memory effect is obtained. In contrast, by using the other cooling conditions, different phases like alpha-phase (Cu-saturated solid solution) are formed as well as martensite. From the corrosion testing results, it was found that the SMA specimens with the fully martensitic microstructure have the highest corrosion re-sistance, where cooling in boiling water was recognized to be optimal. In conclusion, Cu-26Zn-5Al SMA with an improved corrosion resistance can be produced by ARB followed by controlled heat treatment. (c) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据