4.7 Review

Negative Interactions Balance Growth and Defense in Plants Confronted with Herbivores or Pathogens

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c04218

关键词

growth and defense; phytohormones; defensive cost; pathogens and herbivores; induced defense; constitutive defense; specialized metabolites

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program
  3. Natural Science Project of Liaoning
  4. Excellent Training Plan of University
  5. [32000273]
  6. [XLYC1907151]
  7. [LJKZ0655]
  8. [LJKZ0656]
  9. [2020170053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plants have evolved defensive mechanisms against pathogens and herbivores, which can lead to growth or reproduction decreases. However, through antagonism of plant hormones, production of constitutive defensive substances, and utilizing external organisms, plants can effectively reduce the costs of defense and maintain a balance between growth and defense.
Plants have evolved a series of defensive mechanisms against pathogens and herbivores, but the defense response always leads to decreases in growth or reproduction, which has serious implications for agricultural production. Growth and defense are negatively regulated not only through metabolic consumption but also through the antagonism of different phytohormones, such as jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA). Meanwhile, plants can limit the expression of defensive metabolites to reduce the costs of defense by producing constitutive defenses such as glandular trichomes or latex and accumulating specific metabolites, determining the activation of plant defense or the maintenance of plant growth. Interestingly, plant defense pathways might be prepared in advance which may be transmitted to descendants. Plants can also use external organisms to protect themselves, thus minimizing the costs of defense. In addition, plant relatives exhibit cooperation to deal with pathogens and herbivores, which is also a way to regulate growth and defense.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据