4.7 Article

Novel Recyclable UCST-Type Immobilized Glucose Isomerase Biocatalyst with Excellent Performance for Isomerization of Glucose to Fructose

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 70, 期 43, 页码 13959-13968

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c05667

关键词

immobilized glucose isomerase; mVBA-b-P(AAm-co-AN); UCST-responsive polymers; fructose

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. [22078133]
  3. [22278191]
  4. [21878131]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a novel recyclable mVBA-b-P(AAm-co-AN)pglucose isomerase biocatalyst with improved substrate affinity and catalytic efficiency. Compared to the free enzyme, this biocatalyst showed superior stability and recyclability, making it a potential candidate for industrial production of high-fructose syrup.
The development of a suitable immobilization strategy to improve the performance of immobilized glucose isomerase for the isomerization of glucose to fructose is crucial to promoting the industrial production of high-fructose syrup. In this work, a novel recyclable upper critical solution temperature (UCST)-type mVBA-b-P(AAm-co-AN)pglucose isomerase biocatalyst (PVAA@GI) was prepared, and the immobilized glucose isomerase could capture the glucose substrate through the affinity of 4-vinylbenzeneboronic acid (4-VBA) and the glucose substrate, which led to the enhanced substrate affinity and catalytic efficiency of the PVAA@GI. The biocatalyst exhibited excellent stability in pH, thermal, storage, and recycling compared to the free enzyme. The mVBA-b-P(AAm-co-AN)pi glucose isomerase biocatalyst displayed reversibly soluble-insoluble characteristics with temperature change, which was in the soluble state during the enzyme reaction process but could be recovered in an insoluble form by lowering the temperature after the reaction. The highest fructose production rate reached 62.79%, which would have potential application in the industrial production of high-fructose syrup.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据