4.7 Article

Effects of Alternating Electric Field Assisted Freezing-Thawing-Aging Sequence on Data-Independent Acquisition Quantitative Proteomics of Longissimus dorsi Muscle

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c04207

关键词

DIA; proteomics; alternating electric field; freezing-thawing-aging; meat quality

资金

  1. Special Fund of National Key R&D Program of China
  2. [2021YFD2100803]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the proteome differences in bovine Longissimus dorsi muscle during an alternating electric field (AEF)-assisted freezing-thawing-aging sequence. The group assisted by AEF showed improved meat quality compared to the only postmortem aging group. Biochemical markers of beef quality were identified among the differentially abundant proteins. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the impact of AEF-assisted freezing-thawing-aging sequence on beef quality.
This study was designed to investigate the differences in the proteomes of bovine Longissimus dorsi (LD) muscle during an alternating electric field (AEF)-assisted freezing-thawing-aging sequence based on a data-independent acquisition strategy. When compared to that of the only postmortem aging (OA) group, the meat quality of the freezing-thawing-aging sequence (FA) and AEF-assisted freezing-thawing-aging sequence (EA) groups showed a declining trend. However, the group assisted by AEF was significantly enhanced in color, water-holding capacity, and tenderness. Three hundred fifty-two proteins in LD muscle were differentially abundant proteins (DAPs) among FA, EA, and OA treatments. Furthermore, among the 40 DAPs in the FA versus EA comparison, 5 DAPs with variable importance in projection scores higher than 1 were identified as biochemical markers of beef quality. Bioinformatic analysis revealed that most of these proteins were involved in structural constituents of ribosome and catalytic activity. These results provide a basis for further understanding the quality of beef following a freezing- thawing-aging sequence assisted by AEF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据