4.4 Article

Tympanic bullae ultrasonography is feasible in nonsedated healthy rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus)

出版社

AMER VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.2460/javma.22.06.0235

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrasound examination of the tympanic bullae (TB) in live rabbits without sedation is feasible and well tolerated. The depth of the TB is linked to the size of the rabbit and its jaw. Ultrasound of the TB is easy to learn and rapid to perform, with a mean examination time of less than 10 minutes.
OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility of ultrasonography of the tympanic bullae (TB) in live, nonsedated rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). ANIMALS 40 healthy rabbits undergoing TB ultrasonography without sedation between September 2021 and May 2022. PROCEDURES For each rabbit, fur was clipped over an area (3 X 3 cm) at the level of the angular process of each mandible, then 3 ultrasonographic planes of each TB were imaged via ventral approach, with measurement of the time taken to complete the examination. Three items were assessed for each plane: TB depth, wall integrity, and contents (present or absent). Results were compared for rabbits grouped as standard-sized breed type versus dwarf-sized breed type. RESULTS The examination could be carried out successfully in 36 of 40 (90%) of rabbits with clipping. The restraint and examination were relatively well tolerated by the animals, except for the transverse sections. Obtaining oblique and longitudinal sections, carried out on 33 of 40 (83%) rabbits in our study, allowed for evaluation of the TB. The examination was feasible with all rabbit sizes. The depth of the TB was found to be linked to the size of the rabbit and especially to the size of its jaw. Visualization of the distal bulla wall was observed in 2 of the 40 (5%) subjects, consistent with abnormal fluid contents or bulla osteitis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Ultrasonography of the TB was easy to learn and rapid to perform, with a mean examination time of < 10 minutes (mean of 8.71 minutes) without any sedation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据