4.3 Review

Fused Polycyclic NHC Ligands in Gold Catalysis: Recent Advances

期刊

ISRAEL JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ijch.202200051

关键词

Carbenes; Gold; Catalysis; Asymmetric Catalysis; Nitrogen Heterocycles

资金

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-21-CE07-0054-03]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-21-CE07-0054] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligands have gained considerable importance in gold catalysis due to their appealing properties. Fused polyaromatic NHCs, featuring fused aromatic rings, have attracted wider attention in recent years for their unique structural and electronic properties. These versatile platforms offer superior activity and/or selectivity in NHC-gold catalysis and provide opportunities for further functionalization, chirality introduction, stimuli-responsiveness, or cooperativity within the NHC-gold systems.
Thanks to their appealing properties, N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligands gained considerable significance as highly powerful ancillary ligands in gold catalysis. While NHC-gold catalysis is still dominated by the classical imidazole-derived NHC ligands, annelated NHC systems, which feature fused aromatic rings to the carbenic heterocycle, have drawn wider attention over the last few years thanks to their unique structural and electronic properties. Fused polyaromatic NHCs are indeed versatile platforms that offer unique stereoelectronic tuning possibilities to exhibit superior activity and/or selectivity in NHC-gold catalysis. But their polycyclic scaffolds also provide further scope for functionalization and the introduction of chirality, stimuli-responsiveness, or cooperativity within the NHC-gold systems. In this review, the recent advances in this area are discussed and a particular attention is drawn on the unique role of the annelation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据