4.7 Article

Adaptive multiscale and dual subnet convolutional auto-encoder for intermittent fault detection of analog circuits in noise environment

期刊

ISA TRANSACTIONS
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 428-441

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2022.10.031

关键词

Convolutional auto-encoder; Adaptive multiscale learning; Dual subnet structure; Intermittent fault detection; Analog circuits

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an adaptive multiscale and dual subnet convolutional auto-encoder (AMDSCAE) to detect intermittent faults (IFs) in analog circuits. The AMDSCAE method can assign different attention and fuse multiscale information adaptively, resulting in better noise robustness. Additionally, the dual subnet structure enhances the IF detection ability and can detect weaker faults. Experimental results on three typical analog filter circuits demonstrate that AMDSCAE has better noise immunity and can detect weaker IFs.
In avionics , industrial electronic systems, analog circuits are one of the most commonly used components. Intermittent faults (IFs) are a no fault found (NFF) state in analog circuits that are difficult to detect. In addition, the presence of noise may obscure critical information about the state of the circuit. Considering these challenges, this paper proposes an adaptive multiscale and dual subnet convolutional auto-encoder (AMDSCAE) to detect IFs. The proposed method can adaptively assign different attention to each scale and then fuse the multiscale information, which has better noise robustness. Then, the fault reconstruction error is amplified by the dual subnet structure to enhance the IF detection ability and find weaker faults. Considering the difficulty of obtaining fault sample labels, the proposed model requires only fault-free samples in the training process. In three typical analog filter circuit experiments, AMDSCAE has better noise immunity and can detect weaker IFs.(c) 2022 ISA. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据