4.5 Article

NaBF4-dimethyl sulfoxide/NaCl-H2O biphasic electrolytes for magnesium-air batteries

期刊

IONICS
卷 28, 期 11, 页码 5243-5250

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-022-04741-x

关键词

Mg-air battery; Biphasic electrolytes; Dimethyl sulfoxide; NaBF4; Hydrogen evolution reaction (HER)

资金

  1. DNL Cooperation Fund, CAS [DNL202011]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA22010601]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51802059, 21905070, 22075062]
  4. Shenzhen Science and Technology Program [JCYJ20210324120400002, SGDX20210823103803017]
  5. Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province [2022CXGC010305]
  6. Heilongjiang Touyan Team [HITTY-20190033]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [FRFCU5710051922]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a NaBF4-DMSO/NaCl-H2O biphasic electrolyte was used to improve the anode utilization rate and anode energy density in Mg-air battery.
Mg-air battery is a promising electrochemical system for high-energy-density, long storage application. However, its commercialization is hindered by the low anode utilization rate mainly caused by the serious hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) in traditional NaCl aqueous electrolyte. Herein, we report NaBF4-dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)/NaCl-H2O biphasic electrolytes to alleviate the anode HER corrosion by allowing anodic reaction to take place in organic solution DMSO while ensuring high cathode activity with applying cathode reaction to occur in NaCl-H2O solution. The discharge results show that its utilization rate of AZ61 alloy in NaBF4-DMSO/NaCl-H2O biphasic electrolytes is increased to 67% at 1 mA cm(-2) which is 17% higher than in NaCl-H2O single electrolyte, and the anode energy density is up to 2020 Wh kg(-1). In addition, even at 15 mA cm(-2), its discharge voltage is still up to 1.02 V which is higher than that in similar literatures using organic electrolytes for Mg anode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据