4.7 Article

Neurological sequelae of bacterial meningitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
卷 73, 期 1, 页码 18-27

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.04.009

关键词

Meningitis; Sequelae; Focal neurological deficits; Hearing loss; Cognitive impairment; Epilepsy

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [281156]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw
  3. NWO-Vidi grant) [016.116.358]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: We reported on occurrence and impact of neurological sequelae after bacterial meningitis. Methods: We reviewed occurrence of neurological sequelae in children and adults after pneumococcal and meningococcal meningitis. Results: Most frequently reported sequelae are focal neurological deficits, hearing loss, cognitive impairment and epilepsy. Adults with pneumococcal meningitis have the highest risk of developing focal neurological deficits, which are most commonly caused by cerebral infarction, but can also be due to cerebritis, subdural empyema, cerebral abscess or intracerebral bleeding. Focal deficits may improve during clinical course and even after discharge, but a proportion of patients will have persisting focal neurological deficits that often interfere in patient's daily life. Hearing loss occurs in a high proportion of patients with pneumococcal meningitis and has been associated with co-existing otitis. Children and adults recovering from bacterial meningitis without apparent neurological deficits are at risk for long-term cognitive deficits. Early identification of neurological sequelae is important for children to prevent additional developmental delay, and for adults to achieve successful return in society after the disease. Conclusions: Neurological sequelae occur in a substantial amount of patients following bacterial meningitis. Most frequently reported sequelae are focal neurological deficits, hearing loss, cognitive impairment and epilepsy. (C) 2016 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据