4.7 Article

Optimisation framework and method for solving the serial dual-shop collaborative scheduling problem

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 13, 页码 4341-4357

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2123057

关键词

Serial dual-shop collaborative shop scheduling; optimisation framework; hybrid flow shop scheduling; job shop scheduling; neighbourhood structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on the optimization framework for the serial multi-shop cooperative scheduling problem. It proposes four different optimization frameworks and compares their results using a taboo search algorithm and testing instances.
Due to the production process or environment, most products need to go through multiple production workshops, from raw materials to finished products. For example, a large structural part must go through a blanking workshop and a machining workshop. However, the research on the serial multi-shop cooperative scheduling problem is insufficient. Different from the single shop scheduling problem, the multi-shop scheduling problem can be regarded as a scheduling problem composed of multiple sub-problems. Therefore, optimisation processes between subproblems may be the key to solving this kind of problem. This paper focuses on the optimisation framework for the serial multi-shop cooperative scheduling problem. A specific serial dual-shop collaborative scheduling problem is abstracted from the production, whose first and second shop is the hybrid flow shop and the job shop, respectively. A disjunctive graph model of this specific problem is constructed. After that, four different optimisation frameworks are proposed, and testing instances are designed to compare these frameworks. Under different optimisation frameworks, the same tabu search algorithm with an efficient neighbourhood structure is used to optimize this problem. Finally, the optimisation results of different frameworks are compared and the results of each optimisation framework are analyzed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据