4.7 Article

IoT-enabled delivery time guarantee in logistics outsourcing and efficiency improvement

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 12, 页码 4135-4156

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2117868

关键词

IoT-enabled-PDT-quotation; logistics outsourcing; service system optimization; game theory; efficiency improvement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the value of IoT-enabled PDT quotation in a brand's logistics outsourcing decisions and found that the imbalanced payoffs between PDT cost-saving and sales volume expansion may make investing in the IoT-enabled logistics system not beneficial in highly competitive markets.
Industrial Internet of Things (IoT) technologies have been widely implemented in today's logistics operations to reduce the handling time and improve service efficiency. This enables a firm to promise a delivery time (PDT) when selling products, which improves customer satisfaction and enhances the firm's brand image. However, the costly PDT logistics service should be seriously evaluated when the market competition is intensified to aggravate the firm's cost concern. In a competitive decentralized framework, this paper investigates the value of IoT-enabled PDT quotation in a brand's logistics outsourcing decisions. We develop three-stage optimization models and show that the brand's production quantity and equilibrium profit exhibit non-monotonic relationships to the competition intensity degree. Given a moderate competition intensity degree, the brand developing IoT and quoting PDT suffers from imbalanced payoffs between PDT cost-saving and sales volume expansion. This distorts the PDT cost and hence, investing in the IoT-enabled logistics system might not be beneficial. This paper contributes to the existing literature by examining the impact of heterogeneous logistics service incorporating the PDT quotation on traditional quantity competition within a dual-channel supply chain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据