4.7 Article

Coupled diffusion-mechanics framework for simulating hydrogen assisted deformation and failure behavior of metals

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103392

关键词

Hydrogen embrittlement; Crystal plasticity; Dislocations; Finite element; Failure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modeling the coupled diffusion-mechanics response is essential for understanding the multifaceted hydrogen-assisted damage evolution in metallic materials. This study utilizes a dislocation density-based crystal plasticity model coupled with a hydrogen diffusion/trapping model to simulate the deformation and failure under the HELP mechanism of hydrogen embrittlement. The findings highlight the significant role of hydrogen in influencing dislocation interactions and density, leading to macroscopic softening or hardening.
Understanding of years-old multifaceted hydrogen-assisted damage evolution necessitates efforts to model the coupled diffusion-mechanics response in metallic materials. Informed by the dislocation-hydrogen interactions, understood earlier via experiments and/or multi-scale mod-eling techniques, this work presents a dislocation density-based crystal plasticity model coupled with a hydrogen diffusion/trapping model to simulate the hydrogen-assisted deformation and failure under the HELP mechanism of hydrogen embrittlement. The important role of hydrogen on dislocation multiplication, annihilation and dislocation interaction weakening are included in the presented framework. Two possible scenarios under HELP mechanism, leading to H-induced macroscopic softening or hardening as a result of trade-off between the hydrogen-induced weakening of dislocation interactions and hydrogen-induced increased dislocation density emerges from the simulation studies. These finding points towards the inevitable role of HELP mechanism to cause early failure in metals either working independently or in support with additional mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据