4.7 Article

The prevalence, population structure and screening test specificity of penicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia isolates in Malmo, Sweden

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
卷 73, 期 2, 页码 129-135

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.05.011

关键词

Bacteremia; Staphylococcus aureus; Penicillin; Susceptibility testing

资金

  1. Alfred Osterlund
  2. Anna and Edwin Berger foundation
  3. Greta and Johan Kock foundations
  4. O. E. och Edla Johanssons
  5. Swedish Medical Research Council [521-2014-2273]
  6. Physiographical Society (Forssman's Foundation)
  7. Skane County Council's research and development foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to examine the prevalence of penicillin-susceptible bacteremic Staphylococcus aureus in the Malmo area in 2014, to re-evaluate the phenotypic methods of penicillinase detection on these isolates, and to investigate the clonal distribution of penicillin-susceptible isolates. Methods: All non-redundant S. aureus from blood in the Malmo catchment area in southern Sweden 2014 were screened for penicillin susceptibility using PcG 1U disk diffusion, E-test PcG and the nitrocefin test. All isolates screened as likely susceptible were subjected to PCR for detection of penicillinase (blaZ) and spa-typing. Results: Almost one out of three bacteremic isolates (80/257; 31.1%) were susceptible to penicillin. All screening methods except for the nitrocefin test alone had a low proportion of isolates falsely tested as susceptible, but no method used in the study had perfect specificity compared with PCR. Penicillin-susceptible isolates had a distinct phylogenetic distribution, and two clonal complexes (CC5 and CC45) constituted half of the isolates. Conclusion: Almost one third of S. aureus isolated from blood in southern Sweden in 2014 was susceptible to penicillin. Considering that intravenous penicillin has theoretical advantages compared with the standard treatment in the study area, we argue that routine testing of penicillin susceptibility should be reconsidered. (C) 2016 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据