4.2 Article

Reliability of a pediatric sleep endoscopy scoring system

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111284

关键词

Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea; Drug induced sleep endoscopy; DISE; Test-retest reliability; Inter-rater reliability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared a novel scoring system to the commonly used VOTE system in pediatric Drug Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE). The results showed that the novel scoring system demonstrated similar intra-rater test-retest and inter-rater reliability to the VOTE system, and it included more sites of potential airway obstruction.
Introduction: The surgical management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) may be guided by Drug Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE), but there is no universally accepted scoring system for DISE in children. The purpose of this study is to compare a novel system to the more commonly used VOTE (Velum, Oropharynx, Tongue base, Epiglottis) system. Methods: A total of thirty pediatric DISE videos were reviewed and scored twice by 5 raters with a range of experience levels. The videos were scored using both the VOTE and the new scoring systems. The raters were also asked to recommend surgical intervention based on the DISE exam alone. Intra-rater test-retest analysis of the responses was conducted using weighted kappa (WK) statistic and percentage agreement (PA), respectively. Inter-rater reliability analysis of responses was evaluated using Krippendorff's alpha reliability coefficient (KA). Using a proportional odds model, a comparison of the weighted kappa statistic for the VOTE and the novel scoring systems was conducted. Results: For the novel scoring system, the intra-rater test-retest WK coefficient was 0.62 and 0.87 and the PA was 64% and 82% at the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. For the VOTE system, the intra-rater test-retest WK coefficient was 0.50 and 1.00 and PA was 75% and 100% at the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. KA was 0.36 and 0.77 at the 25th and 75th percentiles. In addition, responses to the surgical intervention survey analysis yielded a test-retest WK coefficient of 0.40 and 1.00 and a PA 71%-100% at the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. KA was 0.40 and 0.61 at the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. There was no significant difference between the 2 scoring systems on the WK statistic (p = .15), but significant difference on PA (p = .01). Conclusion: Our novel scoring system demonstrated intra-rater test-retest and inter-rater reliability similar to the VOTE system, includes more sites of potential airway obstruction, and has potential for widespread use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据