4.6 Review

Epigenetic modifications: Critical participants of the PD-L1 regulatory mechanism in solid tumors (Review)

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
卷 61, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2022.5424

关键词

PD-L1; epigenetic modifications; ICIs; immunotherapy; solid tumors

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review focuses on the latest research progress in elucidating the epigenetic mechanism regulating PD-L1 expression, discussing its biological and clinical implications in solid tumors. Furthermore, it proposes the potential of rational combination of epigenetic regulation and PD-1/PD-L1 blockade to improve the prognosis of patients with solid tumors.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis have achieved marked and durable efficacy in patients with different solid tumors and have improved their survival. However, the presence of primary or acquired resistance to immune checkpoint blockades results in only a small fraction of patients benefiting from the treatment. An increasing number of preclinical studies have reported that PD-L1 expression in tumor cells is involved in a number of epigenetic changes, including histone modifications, non-coding RNA regulation and DNA methylation. In addition, multiple epigenetic targeting drugs have been demonstrated to directly or indirectly interfere with PD-L1 expression in various cancer models. This provides opportunities to better characterize the regulatory mechanisms of PD-L1 expression and explore novel therapeutic strategies to improve immunosuppressant response rates and overcome drug resistance. The present review focuses on the latest findings and evidence on the epigenetic mechanism regulating PD-L1 expression and discusses the biological and clinical implications of this regulatory mechanism in solid tumors. A rational combination of epigenetic regulation and PD-1/PD-L1 axis blockade may improve the prognosis of patients with solid tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据