4.5 Article

Fabrication of curcumin-loaded gum tragacanth/poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofibers with optimized electrospinning parameters

期刊

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL TEXTILES
卷 46, 期 5, 页码 1170-1192

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1528083715613631

关键词

Electrospining; nanofiber; response surface methodology; artificial neural network; optimization; biological properties

资金

  1. Iran National Science Foundatio (INSF) [91046806]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on using response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) to optimize the diameter of Gum tragacanth (GT)/poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) nanofibers. However, producing curcumin-loaded GT/PVA nanofibers with using these optimized conditions is another aim. RSM methodology based on four variables (voltage, feed rate, distance between nozzle and collector, and solution concentration) with three levels and ANN technique were compared for modeling the average diameter of nanofibers. In the RSM method, the individual and interaction effects between the parameters on the average diameter of nanofibers were determined using Box-Behnken design (BBD). Data sets of input-output patterns were used for training the multilayer perceptron (MP) neural networks trained with back-propagation algorithm for modeling purpose. Experimental results for both ANN and RSM techniques showed agreement with the predicted fiber diameter. High-regression coefficient between the variables and the response displayed that the performance of RSM for minimizing diameter of nanofibers was better than ANN. Based on response surface model, optimum conditions (polymer concentration of 4.2% (w/v), distance between the capillary and collector 20 cm, applied voltage of 20 kV and flow rate of 0.5 mL/h) were obtained for producing GT/PVA nanofibers with minimized diameter. Then curcumin-loaded GT/PVA nanofibers were produced with acquired optimum condition and the effect of curcumin concentration (3 and 5% (w/v)) on the morphology, diameter and biological properties of nanofibers was investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据