4.7 Article

Mutant Ataxin-2 Expression in Aged Animals Aggravates Neuropathological Features Associated with Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911896

关键词

spinocerebellar ataxia type 2; aging; polyglutamine diseases; autophagy; neurodegeneration

资金

  1. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) [ALG-01-0145-FEDER-29480]
  2. CRESC ALGARVE 2020 co-funding
  3. French Muscular Dystrophy Association (AFM-Telethon) project [22424]
  4. FCT [2020.07892.BD]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Age plays an important role in the onset and progression of SCA2 disease. Aged animals injected with expanded ataxin-2 showed aggravated SCA2 disease phenotype, indicating the significance of aging in SCA2 pathogenesis.
Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2) is a rare autosomal, dominantly inherited disease, in which the affected individuals have a disease onset around their third life decade. The molecular mechanisms underlying SCA2 are not yet completely understood, for which we hypothesize that aging plays a role in SCA2 molecular pathogenesis. In this study, we performed a striatal injection of mutant ataxin-2 mediated by lentiviral vectors, in young and aged animals. Twelve weeks post-injection, we analyzed the striatum for SCA2 neuropathological features and specific aging hallmarks. Our results show that aged animals had a higher number of mutant ataxin-2 aggregates and more neuronal marker loss, compared to young animals. Apoptosis markers, cleaved caspase-3, and cresyl violet staining also indicated increased neuronal death in the aged animal group. Additionally, mRNA levels of microtubule-associated protein 1 light-chain 3B (LC3) and sequestosome-1 (SQSTM1/p62) were altered in the aged animal group, suggesting autophagic pathway dysfunction. This work provides evidence that aged animals injected with expanded ataxin-2 had aggravated SCA2 disease phenotype, suggesting that aging plays an important role in SCA2 disease onset and disease progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据