4.7 Article

Rhus Coriaria L. Extract: Antioxidant Effect and Modulation of Bioenergetic Capacity in Fibroblasts from Parkinson's Disease Patients and THP-1 Macrophages

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232112774

关键词

human fibroblasts; early-onset Parkinson's disease; PARK2; parkin; Rhus coriaria L; antioxidant activity; mitochondria

资金

  1. MIUR [PON01_02093]
  2. University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sumac extract from Rhus coriaria L. may have the potential to improve Parkinson's disease by modulating mitochondrial functionality to reduce H2O2 levels and increase ATP levels.
Sumac, Rhus coriaria L., is a Mediterranean plant showing several useful properties, such as antioxidant and neuroprotective effects. Currently, there is no evidence about its possible neuroprotective action in Parkinson's disease (PD). We hypothesized that sumac could modulate mitochondrial functionality in fibroblasts of familial early-onset PD patients showing PARK2 mutations. Sumac extract volatile profile, polyphenolic content and antioxidant activity have been previously characterized. We evaluated ROS and ATP levels on sumac-treated patients' and healthy control fibroblasts. In PD fibroblasts, all treatments were effective in reducing H2O2 levels, while patients' ATP content was modulated differently, probably due to the varying mutations in the PARK2 gene found in individual patients which are also involved in different mitochondrial phenotypes. We also investigated the effect of sumac extract on THP-1-differentiated macrophages, which show different embryogenic origin with respect to fibroblasts. In THP-1 macrophages, sumac treatment determined a reduction in H2O2 levels and an increase in the mitochondrial ATP content in M1, assuming that sumac could polarize the M1 to M2 phenotype, as demonstrated with other food-derived compounds rich in polyphenols. In conclusion, Rhus coriaria L. extracts could represent a potential nutraceutical approach to PD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据