4.7 Article

Evidence that Transcriptional Alterations in Sarcoptes scabiei Are under Tight Post-Transcriptional (microRNA) Control

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23179719

关键词

Sarcoptes scabiei; development; transcription; mRNA; microRNA

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC)
  3. NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study revealed significant negative and positive correlations between miRNAs and gene transcription levels between different developmental stages of Sarcoptes scabiei, which may be associated with processes such as metabolism and genetic information processing.
Here, we explored transcriptomic differences among early egg (Ee), late egg (Le) and adult female (Af) stages of the scabies mite, Sarcoptes scabiei, using an integrative bioinformatic approach. We recorded a high, negative correlation between miRNAs and genes with decreased mRNA transcription between the developmental stages, indicating substantial post-transcriptional repression; we also showed a positive correlation between miRNAs and genes with increased mRNA transcription, suggesting indirect post-transcriptional regulation. The alterations in mRNA transcription between the egg and adult female stages of S. scabiei were inferred to be linked to metabolism (including carbohydrate and lipid degradation, amino acid and energy metabolism), environmental information processing (e.g., signal transduction and signalling molecules), genetic information processing (e.g., transcription and translation) and/or organismal systems. Taken together, these results provide insight into the transcription of this socioeconomically important parasitic mite, with a particular focus on the egg stage. This work encourages further, detailed laboratory studies of miRNA regulation across all developmental stages of S. scabiei and might assist in discovering new intervention targets in the egg stage of S. scabiei.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据