4.7 Article

Optimization of Prime Editing in Rice, Peanut, Chickpea, and Cowpea Protoplasts by Restoration of GFP Activity

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23179809

关键词

prime editing; CRISPR-Cas9; dual pegRNA; mutant GFP; legume; editing efficiency

资金

  1. USDA NIFA [2022-67013-36210]
  2. Texas A&M AgriLife Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prime editing is a newly developed precise editing technology that can be widely applied to plant genome editing, including different crops. In rice, peanut, chickpea, and cowpea, the use of dual pegRNA vectors can significantly increase the efficiency of Prime editing. These initial results are of great significance for accelerating legume breeding programs to accelerate crop improvement.
Precise editing of the plant genome has long been desired for functional genomic research and crop breeding. Prime editing is a newly developed precise editing technology based on CRISPRCas9, which uses an engineered reverse transcriptase (RT), a catalytically impaired Cas9 endonuclease (nCas9), and a prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA). In addition, prime editing has a wider range of editing types than base editing and can produce nearly all types of edits. Although prime editing was first established in human cells, it has recently been applied to plants. As a relatively new technique, optimization will be needed to increase the editing efficiency in different crops. In this study, we successfully edited a mutant GFP in rice, peanut, chickpea, and cowpea protoplasts. In rice, up to 16 times higher editing efficiency was achieved with a dual pegRNA than the single pegRNA containing vectors. Edited-mutant GFP protoplasts have also been obtained in peanut, chickpea, and cowpea after transformation with the dual pegRNA vectors, albeit with much lower editing efficiency than in rice, ranging from 0.2% to 0.5%. These initial results promise to expedite the application of prime editing in legume breeding programs to accelerate crop improvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据