4.7 Article

Downregulation of P300/CBP-Associated Factor Protects from Vascular Aging via Nrf2 Signal Pathway Activation

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232012574

关键词

P300; CBP-associated factor; vascular aging; senescence; nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2; oxidative stress

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing evidence suggests that PCAF plays a key role in vascular aging. Downregulation of PCAF can alleviate vascular aging by activating Nrf2 and reducing oxidative stress.
Increasing evidence has shown that vascular aging has a key role in the pathogenesis of vascular diseases. P300/CBP-associated factor (PCAF) is involved in many vascular pathological processes, but the role of PCAF in vascular aging is unknown. This study aims to explore the role and underlying mechanism of PCAF in vascular aging. The results demonstrated that the expression of PCAF was associated with age and aging, and remarkably increased expression of PCAF was present in human atherosclerotic coronary artery. Downregulation of PCAF could reduce angiotensin II (AngII)-induced senescence of rat aortic endothelial cells (ECs) in vitro. In addition, inhibition of PCAF with garcinol alleviated AngII-induced vascular senescence phenotype in mice. Downregulation of PCAF could alleviate AngII-induced oxidative stress injury in ECs and vascular tissue. Moreover, PCAF and nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) could interact directly, and downregulation of PCAF alleviated vascular aging by promoting the activation of Nrf2 and enhancing the expression of its downstream anti-aging factors. The silencing of Nrf2 with small interfering RNA attenuated the protective effect of PCAF downregulation from vascular aging. These findings indicate that downregulation of PCAF alleviates oxidative stress by activating the Nrf2 signaling pathway and ultimately inhibits vascular aging. Thus, PCAF may be a promising target for aging-related cardiovascular disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据