4.7 Article

Isolation and Sequencing of Chromosome Arm 7RS of Rye, Secale cereale

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911106

关键词

rye; isolated chromosome arm sequencing; presence-absence variation

资金

  1. Australia Research Council [DP210100296, DP200100762, DE210100398]
  2. Pawsey Supercomputing Centre
  3. Australian Government
  4. Government ofWestern Australia
  5. ERDF project Plants as a tool for sustainable global development [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000827]
  6. Grains Research and Development Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study isolated and sequenced the short arm of rye chromosome 7 (7RS) and compared it to a public reference assembly. The results revealed important genomic diversity and identified genes that were present in Triticale but absent in the reference assembly. These findings are significant for understanding rye's genomic diversity and wheat improvement.
Rye (Secale cereale) is a climate-resilient cereal grown extensively as grain or forage crop in Northern and Eastern Europe. In addition to being an important crop, it has been used to improve wheat through introgression of genomic regions for improved yield and disease resistance. Understanding the genomic diversity of rye will assist both the improvement of this crop and facilitate the introgression of more valuable traits into wheat. Here, we isolated and sequenced the short arm of rye chromosome 7 (7RS) from Triticale 380SD using flow cytometry and compared it to the public Lo7 rye whole genome reference assembly. We identify 2747 Lo7 genes present on the isolated chromosome arm and two clusters containing seven and sixty-five genes that are present on Triticale 380SD 7RS, but absent from Lo7 7RS. We identified 29 genes that are not assigned to chromosomal locations in the Lo7 assembly but are present on Triticale 380SD 7RS, suggesting a chromosome arm location for these genes. Our study supports the Lo7 reference assembly and provides a repertoire of genes on Triticale 7RS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据