4.7 Article

Circulating EGFR Mutations in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma by Circulating Tumor Cell Isolation Systems: A Concordance Study

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms231810661

关键词

liquid biopsy; circulating tumor cells; EGFR mutation; lung adenocarcinoma

资金

  1. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital [CMRPVVK0092, CMRPVVL0021, CMRPG3H0873]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST-108-2314-B-182-024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a hybrid platform using a negative and positive selection strategy to capture circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and detect EGFR mutations in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. The results showed that CTCs could serve as a reliable source of lung cancer tumor DNA for detecting EGFR mutations.
Background: We developed a hybrid platform using a negative combined with a positive selection strategy to capture circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and detect epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: Blood samples were collected from patients with pathology-proven treatment-naive stage IV lung adenocarcinoma. Genomic DNA was extracted from CTCs collected for EGFR mutational tests. The second set of CTC-EGFR mutational tests were performed after three months of anti-cancer therapy. Results: A total of 80 samples collected from 28 patients enrolled between July 2016 and August 2018. Seventeen patients had EGFR mutations, including Exon 19 deletion (n = 11), L858R (n = 5), and de-novo T790 and L858R (n = 1). Concordance between tissue and CTCs before treatment was 88.2% in EGFR- mutant patients and 90.9% in non-mutant patients. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of EGFR mutation tests for CTCs were 89.3%, 88.2%, 90.9%, 93.8%, and 83.3%, respectively. Conclusions: CTCs captured by a hybrid platform using a negative and positive selection strategy may serve as a suitable and reliable source of lung cancer tumor DNA for detecting EGFR mutations, including T790M.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据