4.7 Article

Connexin Lateralization Contributes to Male Susceptibility to Atrial Fibrillation

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms231810696

关键词

atrial fibrillation; sex differences; connexins; conduction; orchiectomy; sex hormones

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [PJT-153069]
  2. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Sante (FRQS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Men have a higher risk of developing atrial fibrillation than women. This study found that male mice have different atrial electrical and structural properties compared to females, and castration can reduce the susceptibility of male mice to atrial fibrillation.
Men have a higher risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF) than women, though the reason for this is unknown. Here, we compared atrial electrical and structural properties in male and female mice and explored the contribution of sex hormones. Cellular electrophysiological studies revealed that action potential configuration, Na+ and K+ currents were similar in atrial myocytes from male and female mice (4-5 months). Immunofluorescence showed that male atrial myocytes had more lateralization of connexins 40 (63 +/- 4%) and 43 (66 +/- 4%) than females (Cx40: 45 +/- 4%, p = 0.006; Cx43: 44 +/- 4%, p = 0.002), with no difference in mRNA expression. Atrial mass was significantly higher in males. Atrial myocyte dimensions were also larger in males. Atrial fibrosis was low and similar between sexes. Orchiectomy (ORC) abolished sex differences in AF susceptibility (M: 65%; ORC: 38%, p = 0.050) by reducing connexin lateralization and myocyte dimensions. Ovariectomy (OVX) did not influence AF susceptibility (F: 42%; OVX: 33%). This study shows that prior to the development of age-related remodeling, male mice have more connexin lateralization and larger atria and atrial myocyte than females. Orchiectomy reduced AF susceptibility in males by decreasing connexin lateralization and atrial myocyte size, supporting a role for androgens. These sex differences in AF substrates may contribute to male predisposition to AF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据