4.7 Article

Evaluating the Suitability of 3D Bioprinted Samples for Experimental Radiotherapy: A Pilot Study

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23179951

关键词

3D bioprinting; DNA damage; gammaH2AX; experimental radiotherapy; high dose rate radiotherapy; human lung cancer cells; microbeam radiotherapy (MRT)

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SCHU 2589/7-1]
  2. PETRA III travel grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radiotherapy is crucial in the treatment of lung cancer, but standardized samples are needed to evaluate new therapeutic approaches. 3D bioprinting techniques provide a sophisticated solution to this challenge. A pilot project using 3D printed standardized samples evaluated the effectiveness of radiotherapy.
Radiotherapy is an important component in the treatment of lung cancer, one of the most common cancers worldwide, frequently resulting in death within only a few years of diagnosis. In order to evaluate new therapeutic approaches and compare their efficiency with regard to tumour control at a pre-clinical stage, it is important to develop standardized samples which can serve as inter-institutional outcome controls, independent of differences in local technical parameters or specific techniques. Recent developments in 3D bioprinting techniques could provide a sophisticated solution to this challenge. We have conducted a pilot project to evaluate the suitability of standardized samples generated from 3D printed human lung cancer cells in radiotherapy studies. The samples were irradiated at high dose rates using both broad beam and microbeam techniques. We found the 3D printed constructs to be sufficiently mechanically stable for use in microbeam studies with peak doses up to 400 Gy to test for cytotoxicity, DNA damage, and cancer cell death in vitro. The results of this study show how 3D structures generated from human lung cancer cells in an additive printing process can be used to study the effects of radiotherapy in a standardized manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据