4.7 Review

The Underlying Relationship between Keratoconus and Down Syndrome

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms231810796

关键词

Keratoconus (KC); Down syndrome (DS); Central Corneal Thickness (CCT); cornea; genetics; mouse models

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [P30EY031631, R01EY023242, R21EY032320, R21EY028671]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review examines the relationship between keratoconus and Down Syndrome, aiming to provide a better understanding of keratoconus in Down Syndrome patients and promote research to improve their vision and identify effective treatment strategies.
Keratoconus (KC) is one of the most significant corneal disorders worldwide, characterized by the progressive thinning and cone-shaped protrusion of the cornea, which can lead to severe visual impairment. The prevalence of KC varies greatly by ethnic groups and geographic regions and has been observed to be higher in recent years. Although studies reveal a possible link between KC and genetics, hormonal disturbances, environmental factors, and specific comorbidities such as Down Syndrome (DS), the exact cause of KC remains unknown. The incidence of KC ranges from 0% to 71% in DS patients, implying that as the worldwide population of DS patients grows, the number of KC patients may continue to rise significantly. As a result, this review aims to shed more light on the underlying relationship between KC and DS by examining the genetics relating to the cornea, central corneal thickness (CCT), and mechanical forces on the cornea, such as vigorous eye rubbing. Furthermore, this review discusses KC diagnostic and treatment strategies that may help detect KC in DS patients, as well as the available DS mouse models that could be used in modeling KC in DS patients. In summary, this review will provide improved clinical knowledge of KC in DS patients and promote additional KC-related research in these patients to enhance their eyesight and provide suitable treatment targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据