4.7 Review

The Role of Tryptophan Metabolites in Neuropsychiatric Disorders

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23179968

关键词

tryptophan; neuropsychiatric disorders; metabolic pathways; pharmacological influences

资金

  1. Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University Australia
  2. Victoria University Postgraduate Scholarships
  3. Victoria University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes the pharmacological influences of tryptophan and its metabolites on the development of neuropsychiatric disorders, and discusses the quantification of neurotransmitter precursors and the application of biomarkers in disease detection/treatment.
In recent decades, neuropsychiatric disorders such as major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar, etc., have become a global health concern, causing various detrimental influences on patients. Tryptophan is an important amino acid that plays an indisputable role in several physiological processes, including neuronal function and immunity. Tryptophan's metabolism process in the human body occurs using different pathways, including the kynurenine and serotonin pathways. Furthermore, other biologically active components, such as serotonin, melatonin, and niacin, are by-products of Tryptophan pathways. Current evidence suggests that a functional imbalance in the synthesis of Tryptophan metabolites causes the appearance of pathophysiologic mechanisms that leads to various neuropsychiatric diseases. This review summarizes the pharmacological influences of tryptophan and its metabolites on the development of neuropsychiatric disorders. In addition, tryptophan and its metabolites quantification following the neurotransmitters precursor are highlighted. Eventually, the efficiency of various biomarkers such as inflammatory, protein, electrophysiological, genetic, and proteomic biomarkers in the diagnosis/treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders was discussed to understand the biomarker application in the detection/treatment of various diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据