4.7 Article

Histomorphometry Changes and Decreased Reactivity to Angiotensin II in the Ileum and Colon of Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232113233

关键词

diabetes mellitus; STZ; ileum histomorphometry; colon histomorphometry; smooth muscle contraction; Angiotensin II receptors

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT) [2020.06502.BD]
  2. FCT/MCTES [UIDB/50006/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diabetes mellitus is associated with gastrointestinal complications, and a rat model of diabetes showed structural remodelling of the gut wall and decreased contractile response to AngII.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic progressive metabolic disorder associated with several gastrointestinal complications, affecting up to 75% of patients. Knowing that Angiotensin II (AngII) also regulates intestinal contraction, we decided to evaluate changes in ileum and colon histomorphometry and AngII reactivity in a rat model of DM. Streptozotocin (STZ, 55 mg/kg) was administered to induce DM to 24 adult male Wistar rats. Diabetic rats displayed all the characteristic signs of type 1 DM (T1DM) and fecal excretion increased about 4-fold over 14 days, while the excretion of controls remained unaltered. Compared to controls, diabetic ileum and colon presented an increase in both macroscopic (length, perimeter and weight) and microscopic (muscular wall thickness) parameters. Functionally, AngII-induced smooth muscle contraction was lower in diabetic rats, except in the distal colon. These differences in the contractile response to AngII may result from an imbalance between AngII type 1 (antagonized by candesartan, 10 nM) and type 2 receptors activation (antagonized by PD123319, 100 nM). Taken together, these results indicate that an early and refined STZ-induced T1DM rat model already shows structural remodelling of the gut wall and decreased contractile response to AngII, findings that may help to explain diabetic dysmotility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据