4.7 Review

The Italian Research on the Molecular Characterization of Maize Kernel Development

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911383

关键词

maize; kernel; endosperm; seed mutants; seed development; zeins

资金

  1. University of Padova BIRD 2020
  2. VALOMAYS PSR 2014-2020-Regione Lombardia-2021 [7731]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces the research work carried out by the Italian scientific community on the genetic control of maize seed development and seed-related pathways, and highlights their contributions to the characterization of maize mutants and the improvement of maize genomics.
The study of the genetic control of maize seed development and seed-related pathways has been one of the most important themes approached by the Italian scientific community. Maize has always attracted the interest of the Italian community of agricultural genetics since its beginning, as some of its founders based their research projects on and developed their schools by adopting maize as a reference species. Some of them spent periods in the United States, where maize was already becoming a model system, to receive their training. In this manuscript we illustrate the research work carried out in Italy by different groups that studied maize kernels and underline their contributions in elucidating fundamental aspects of caryopsis development through the characterization of maize mutants. Since the 1980s, most of the research projects aimed at the comprehension of the genetic control of seed development and the regulation of storage products' biosyntheses and accumulation, and have been based on forward genetics approaches. We also document that for some decades, Italian groups, mainly based in Northern Italy, have contributed to improve the knowledge of maize genomics, and were both fundamental for further international studies focused on the correct differentiation and patterning of maize kernel compartments and strongly contributed to recent advances in maize research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据