4.6 Article

Assessing the Inequality of Spanish Households through the Carbon Footprint The 21st Century Great Recession Effect

期刊

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 571-581

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12466

关键词

carbon footprint; consumption patterns; industrial ecology; inequality; input-output analysis (IOA); Spain

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports through the National FPU Program [FPU 13/05869]
  2. regional government Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha [PPII-2014-006-P]
  3. MINECO [ECO2012 - 33341]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inequality has recently become a major concern in economics. Leaving aside its social and economic effects is also possible to trace its environmental consequences, which this article attempts to assess. The indicator to be measured is the household's carbon footprint (CF) for different social groups. The deep economic crisis in the Spanish economy between 2008 and 2013 has increased consumption inequality and doubled the number of households below the poverty line. When focusing on domestic consumption, we found that the shopping basket of all income groups has very similar emissions intensities; therefore, the differences among the household CFs depend mainly on the scale effect (i.e., the size of consumption). However, when international trade is also considered, we found that the emission intensity of imports is bigger than the intensity of all the respective domestic goods. Therefore, the share of imported goods and services by social class will be an important determinant of the respective total CF. Before the crisis, households with higher incomes imported 30% of their total consumption items whereas households with lower income imported only 20% of their consumption. During the crisis, the imports of medium-high-income households fell to 20%, whereas low-and middle-income families maintained the same import share, which contributed to the reduction of the total household CF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据