4.7 Article

Degradation studies of proton exchange membrane water electrolysis cells with low platinum group metals- Catalyst coating achieved by atomic layer deposition

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 47, 期 94, 页码 39719-39730

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.159

关键词

PEM water Electrolysis cells; Porous transport electrodes; ALD coating; Long-term performance; Degradation

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany [03SF0564A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the activity and durability of a polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) water electrolysis single cell assembled with porous transport electrodes (PTEs) with low catalyst loading for 500 hours. A current density of 160 mA/cm2 and a high mass activity of 1368 A/gIr were achieved at 60 degrees C with 1 mol/L sulfuric acid. The degradation of the cell was characterized using various electrochemical and physicochemical methods, and the average degradation rate of the cell was determined to be 67 mV/h at 15 mA/cm2. This is the first investigation of the long-term performance of a PEM water electrolysis cell assembled with PTEs coated by ALD.
Activity and durability of a polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) water electrolysis single cell, assembled with porous transport electrodes (PTEs) with a low catalyst loading were investigated for 500 h. A current density of 160 mA/cm2 and a high mass activity of 1368 A/ gIr were achieved while operating at 60 degrees C with 1 mol/L sulfuric acid. The degradation of the cell was characterized using different electrochemical and physicochemical methods before, during and after operation of the electrolysis cell and a mean degradation rate for the cell of 67 mV/h was determined at 15 mA/cm2. To the best of our knowledge this is the first time that long-term performance of a PEM water electrolysis cell assembled with PTEs coated by ALD is investigated.(c) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据