4.7 Article

Mathematical modeling of a direct urea fuel cell

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 48, 期 6, 页码 2314-2327

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.10.052

关键词

Direct urea fuel cell; Anion exchange membrane; Mathematical model; Overpotential; Electrochemical reactions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of an anion exchange membrane-based direct urea/O2 fuel cell (AEMDUFC) was analyzed using a mathematical model. The model was verified using experimental data and showed good accuracy. The voltage losses in the electrodes were dominant at low current density, while the voltage loss in the membrane was the highest at high current density. The structural and operating parameters of the anode side were found to be important factors for improving the performance of the AEMDUFC.
The performance of an anion exchange membrane-based direct urea/O2 fuel cell (AEMDUFC) is analyzed via a mathematical model based on mass/charge transport and electrochemical reactions. The present model is verified using published experimental data, featuring a good accuracy with high R2 of 0.989 for polarization curve. The cell performances are evaluated in terms of voltage losses at anode/cathode, ohmic voltage loss in membrane, and urea crossover. The voltage losses in electrodes are dominant at a low current density; however, that in membrane is the highest at a high current density. The mathematical analysis results indicate that the structural design parameters (membrane thickness, porosity, and thickness of diffusion layers) and the operating parameters (urea fuel concentration and flow rate, O2/air, KOH feed concentration, and temperature) are important factors for high performance of AEM-DUFC. Urea and KOH concentrations exhibit optimum levels because of their composite effect. Overall, improve AEM-DUFC performance mainly depends on the structure and operating parameters of anode side. & COPY; 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据