4.6 Article

Using a Game-Based Translation Learning App and Google Apps to Enhance Translation Skills: Amplification and Omission

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2022.2108591

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the effectiveness of using a digital game-based learning app and Google apps to enhance the translation skills of Taiwanese undergraduate English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students. The findings suggest that both applications can improve students' learning performance and experience in translation courses.
This study investigated whether the translation skills (amplification and omission) of Taiwanese undergraduate English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students could be enhanced by a digital game-based learning app called CHEN-slate and Google apps in an introductory translation course. The two skills were chosen because they are two basic translation skills which require translators to apply totally different techniques to translate. The participants were divided into two groups with two phases. In amplification learning, Group A students used the digital game-based app to learn, while Group B students used Google apps to practice the target skill. For omission learning, Groups A and B switched the learning platform. Pretests, immediate posttests, and delayed posttests were conducted to evaluate students' performance. The study findings indicate that utilizing game-based and Google apps in the translation class could enhance students' learning performance based on their posttests and delayed posttests. The majority of students in both groups also indicated that both systems could enhance their performance and learning experience. This study offers pedagogical implications for instructors in translation courses to improve students' performance and effectively use game-based learning and Google apps in translation courses. Future research should promote the adoption of ICT tools in translation courses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据