4.5 Article

Combined effects of age and endometriosis on ovarian reserve in women with infertility

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14519

关键词

endometrioma; endometriosis; ovarian reserve; ovarian surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the combined effects of age and endometriosis on ovarian reserve in women with infertility. The results show that endometriosis is associated with lower anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicular count (AFC), and the impact is more significant in women aged 35 years or older.
Objective To evaluate the combined effects of age and endometriosis on ovarian reserve in women with infertility. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study using an institutional database. Women with sonographic, laparoscopic, or histologic evidence of endometriosis were defined as the study group and the remaining women served as a control group. We evaluated demographic and clinical characteristics of the groups as a whole and stratified the patients into those aged 35 years or older and those younger than 35 years at the time of ovarian reserve testing. Results Of a total of 656 women included in the final analysis, 71 women had a diagnosis of endometriosis. When compared with women without endometriosis, the median anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicular count (AFC) values were significantly lower in the group of women with endometriosis-median 2.1 ng/ml (interquartile range [IQR] 1.1-3.9) versus 1.2 ng/ml (IQR 0.6-2.4; P < 0.001) for AMH and 14 follicles (IQR 8-23) versus 7 follicles (IQR 5-14; P < 0.001) for AFC. When stratified into two age groups the association between a lower AFC and endometriosis remained significant for both age groups whereas the association between a lower AMH and endometriosis was significant only for the group of women aged 35 years oor older. Conclusion Our study highlights a detrimental effect by endometriosis and an age enhancement effect of endometriosis on ovarian reserve.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据