4.7 Article

Global colorectal cancer research, 2007-2021: Outputs and funding

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 152, 期 3, 页码 470-479

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34279

关键词

colorectal cancer; disease burden; funding; research domains; research outputs

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to provide an evidence base for colorectal cancer research activity that might influence policy. The study found that the volume and funding of global research on colorectal cancer are relatively low, with increased international collaboration except in China. The leading research domains are genetics, surgery, and prognosis, while research on palliative care and quality-of-life is lacking. In terms of funding, Western Europe relies on the charity sector, while China and the USA rely on government funding. Certain Asian countries provide minimal contestable funding, potentially reducing the impact of their colorectal cancer research.
The purpose of this study was to provide an evidence base for colorectal cancer research activity that might influence policy, mainly at the national level. Improvements in healthcare delivery have lengthened life expectancy, but within a situation of increased cancer incidence. The disease burden of CRC has risen significantly, particularly in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Research is key to its control and reduction, but few studies have delineated the volume and funding of global research on CRC. We identified research papers in the Web of Science (WoS) from 2007 to 2021, and determined the contributions of the leading countries, the research domains studied, and their sources of funding. We identified 62 716 papers, representing 5.7% of all cancer papers. This percentage was somewhat disproportionate to the disease burden (7.7% in 2015), especially in Eastern Europe. International collaboration increased over the time period in almost all countries except in China. Genetics, surgery and prognosis were the leading research domains. However, research on palliative care and quality-of-life in CRC was lacking. In Western Europe, the main funding source was the charity sector, particularly in the UK, but in most other countries government played the leading role, especially in China and the USA. There was little support from industry. Several Asian countries provided minimal contestable funding, which may have reduced the impact of their CRC research. Certain countries must perform more CRC research overall, especially in domains such as screening, palliative care and quality-of-life. The private-non-profit sector should be an alternative source of support.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据