4.7 Article

Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of an aminoglycan-rich exopolysaccharide from the submerged fermentation of Bacillus thuringiensis

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.08.116

关键词

Exopolysaccharides; Bacillus thuringiensis IX-01; High-cell-density fermentation; Antioxidant; Anti-inflammation

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFC2101100, 2018YFC1604105-5]
  2. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline [111-2-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study extracted the exopolysaccharide BPS-2 from Bacillus thuringiensis and found that it has strong anti-digestive capacity, as well as anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects in vitro. These findings provide a basis for biopharmaceutical applications of BPS-2.
Proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis are widely used as biopesticides but little is known about its exopoly-saccharides. The exopolysaccharide BPS-2 was extracted from B. thuringiensis IX-01 after high-cell-density fermentation. BPS-2 is a heteropolysaccharide (molecular weight 29.36 kDa) composed of D-galactosamine, arabinose, glucosamine, glucose, and mannose in molar ratios 5.53: 1.77:4.74:3.24:1. In vitro upper gastrointestinal simulations showed that BPS-2 has strong anti-digestive capacity, with scavenging of DPPH, hydroxyl, ABTS, and superoxide anions radicals of 31.34 +/- 1.67 %, 32.43 +/- 3.01 %, 34.31 +/- 2.12 %, and 48.53 +/- 3.55 %, respectively, after BPS-2 entered the colon. It significantly inhibited production of lipopolysaccharide-induced nitric oxide and multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines and had proliferative effects on RAW 264.7 cells. BPS-2 inhibited malondialdehyde secretion and elevated activities of glutathione peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, and total antioxidants, significantly improving the antioxidant status of inflammation model cells. This first report of the in vitro anti-inflammation and antioxidant properties of BPS-2 from B. thuringiensis provides a basis for biopharmaceutical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据