4.7 Article

Investigation of the role of prolines 232/233 in RTPPK motif in tau protein aggregation: An in vitro study

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.08.160

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Cis-trans isomerization; Tau aggregation

资金

  1. National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD) [984494]
  2. Research Council of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences [980308]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the impact of cis-proline isomer on tau protein aggregation by replacing proline residues with alanine residues using genetic engineering. The results show that the trans isomer at the 232nd residue has reduced aggregation propensity. However, there is no significant difference between wild-type and mutant protein aggregations in terms of cell toxicity.
Disease-related tau protein in Alzheimer's disease is hyperphosphorylated and aggregates into neurofibrillary tangles. The cis-proline isomer of the pSer/Thr-Pro sequence has been proposed to act as a precursor of aggregation ('Cistauosis' hypothesis), but this aggregation scheme is not yet entirely accepted. Hence to investigate isomer-specific-aggregation of tau, proline residues at the RTPPK motif were replaced by alanine residues (with permanent trans configuration) employing genetic engineering methods. RTPAK, RTAPK, and RTAAK mutant variants of tau were generated, and their in vitro aggregation propensity was investigated using multi -spectroscopic techniques. Besides, the cell toxicity of oligomers/fibrils was analyzed and compared to those of the wild-type (WT) tau. Analyses of mutant variants have shown to be in agreement (to some degree) to the theory of the 'cistauosis' hypothesis. The results showed that the trans isomer in the 232-rd residue (P232A mutant rather than P233A) had reduced aggregation propensity. However, this study did not illustrate any statistically significant difference between the wild and the mutant protein aggregations concerning cell toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据