4.6 Article

An approach to weld dissimilar polycarbonate and high-density polyethylene by friction stir spot welding

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-022-09995-3

关键词

Friction stir spot welding; Friction stir welding; Welding of polymers; Mechanical testing

资金

  1. Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF)
  2. Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the possibility of friction stir spot welding of dissimilar polycarbonate to high-density polyethylene. The results show that an effective weld can be achieved at a moderate frictional heating temperature between the melting temperature T-m and glass transition temperature T-g of both materials.
The friction stir spot welding of polymeric materials has been examined extensively; conversely, only a few researchers have addressed the friction stir spot welding of dissimilar polymers. In this study, the possibility of friction stir spot welding of dissimilar polycarbonate to high-density polyethylene is examined, which has not been previously investigated. The influence of welding parameters, namely, tool rotational speed and dwell time, was investigated experimentally, whereas the plunging depth, plunging rate, and tool geometry were kept constant during all tests. The induced temperature and the weld lap shear force were recorded and analyzed. Both materials are welded successfully by friction stir spot welding. At 2300 rpm and 40 s dwell time when the polycarbonate sheet was on the top, the maximum lap shear force of 0.37 kN was obtained. The findings demonstrated that an effective weld might be attained at a moderate frictional heating temperature slightly below the melting temperature T-m and glass transition temperature T-g of both welded materials. At very low temperatures, poor weld quality was obtained. When temperatures extensively increased, the results deteriorated to exhibit weak joint lap shear values because of the presence of cavities and pores in the weld junction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据