4.6 Article

Microbial cultivation using mathematical representations accounting for the reaction kinetics in two-stage nitritation/ANAMMOX process

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2022.105473

关键词

Partial nitritation; ANAMMOX; Mathematical representation; Cultivation; Simulation model

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2019R1I1A3A01062509]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study improved the cultivation rate of ANAMMOX microorganisms in the PN/ANAM-MOX reactor using mathematical representations accounting for reaction kinetics, and proposed control strategies to improve reactor performance and cope with fluctuations in raw reject water properties. The results provide important references for scale-up or design of the ANAMMOX process.
Mathematical representations accounting for the reaction kinetics were used to improve the cultivation rate of ANAMMOX microorganisms in the pilot-scale partial nitritation (PN)/anaerobic ammonium oxidation (ANAM-MOX) reactor. In line with the fluctuations in the properties of raw reject water, control strategies of the hydraulic retention time (HRT) and the mixed liquid suspended solid (MLSS) concentration calculated by the mass balance-based model were proposed to improve PN performance. As a result, control of the MLSS concentration to cope with the fluctuation of C/N ratio resulted in a higher nitrite production rate (NPR) that was suitable for enhancing the cultivation rate of the ANAMMOX microorganisms. Based on the performance in the optimized PN, the observed yield of ANAMMOX microorganisms was calculated to be 0.091 gVSS/gNH(4)(+)- N. The biomass as volatile suspended solids (VSS) wasted was 309.8-554.3 gVSS/d. Based on the reaction kinetics of ANAMMOX, the quantity of stored microorganisms over time was simulated using a modified first-order exponential decay model; the calculated value was 6.3-11.2 kg/m3/year. These results can be used for the scale-up or design of the ANAMMOX process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据