4.7 Article

Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of an annealed dual-phase CrFeCoNiAl0.7 high-entropy alloy

期刊

INTERMETALLICS
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2022.107657

关键词

High -entropy alloy; Annealing; Microstructure; Precipitation; Deformation and fracture

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52001236, 51971099]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2020CFB 113]
  3. open fund of State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mold Technology [P2022-010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the microstructures and mechanical properties of an annealed dual-phase high-entropy alloy. The results showed that rod-like B2 phase precipitated from the FCC-solution matrix with increased annealing temperature. The higher annealing temperature resulted in a significant decrease in yield strength, but an increase in fracture strain and work-hardening capacity. The activation volume of the annealed HEA exhibited an abnormal trend due to the formation of co-clusters.
The present work investigated microstructures and mechanical properties of an annealed dual-phase high -entropy alloy (HEA) CrFeCoNiAl0.7 between 700 and 1100 degrees C. It revealed that with the increased annealing temperature, there were rod-like B2 phase precipitating from the FCC-solution matrix, and the orientation between the precipitated B2 phase and the FCC matrix obeyed Kurdjumov-Sachs (K-S) relationship {111}(FCC)// {011}(B2) and <011 >(FCC)//<111 >(B2). The higher annealing temperature resulted in a drastic drop in yield strength, but a significant increase in fracture strain and work-hardening capacity. The positive value of the strain rate sensitivity (SRS) decreased with strain and the SRS of the HEA sample annealed at a lower temperature decreased greatly. Due to the formation of co-clusters, the activation volume of the annealed HEA presented an abnormal trend, that was, it increased with strain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据