4.6 Article

Multiple mating by both sexes in an invasive insect species, Aethina tumida (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae)

期刊

INSECT SCIENCE
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 517-529

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.13112

关键词

evolution of sex; invasive species; multiple partners; polygynandry; reproductive biology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both male and female small hive beetles can mate multiple times, indicating low costs for mating in this species. The study shows that females mated with up to eight males, while males mated with at least seven females. These observations provide novel research avenues for understanding the drivers of multiple mating and its role in promoting biological invasions.
Multiple mating by both sexes is common among sexually reproducing animals. Small hive beetles (SHB), Aethina tumida, are parasites of bee nests endemic to sub-Saharan Africa and have become a widespread invasive species. Despite the considerable economic damages they can cause, their basic biology remains poorly understood. Here we show that male and female small hive beetles can mate multiple times, suggesting that costs for mating are low in this species. In an invasive A. tumida population in the United States, a combination of laboratory experiments for males and paternity analysis with eight polymorphic DNA microsatellite markers for field-caught females were used to estimate the number of mating by both sexes. The data show that females and males can mate multiple times-females mated with up to eight males, whereas males mated with at least seven females. The results also showed that A. tumida displayed a skewed paternity, although this was not consistent among the tested females. Thus, first or last male advantage seem to be unlikely in A. tumida. Our observations that individuals of both sexes of A. tumida can mate multiple times opens new research avenues for examining drivers of multiple mating and determining the role it may play in promoting biological invasions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据